gnasher | 1495 inbox ✘ hollyheights [ CLOSED ]

Skip to Main Content

Entry tags:

1495 inbox ✘ hollyheights [ CLOSED ]

INBOX CLOSED
RIP IN PIECES 08.13.15 - END GAME

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

good!

anyway hello

don't just switch topics so quickly it's insulting

hi

but what else was i supposed to say to 'good'
i wanted to keep talking to you

you could talk about how tough i am compared to that aone guy.

but aone-kun's like a stone... steady and unmovable...

that's just a sign of inflexibility! it's better to be the water than the stone!

are you comparing yourself to him?
why

because obviously i wanna be the one to save you!

of course i hope you're the one who saves me...

you don't have to hope, because i definitely will!

okay...uhm.. i'll send you more of these if i get more...then?

we agreed on that already!

i guess so..

[ah]

we're talking about it again. sorry.

that's not your type though, right?

type? what do you mean?

you know, type. of guy. bulky and tall and gruff.

[not,,, shorter and slimmer than you and with a naturally thinner build that has to be actively told to bulk up]

[the gruffness he might have pretended at, once upon a time, but he knows Makoto knows him better than that for now -- he's the red one]

[........a long pause before his text........]

not really

[does makoto have a type??]

not really???/

[conclusion: Makoto is ashamed he's dating a twig-waisted toddler whose biceps can't crush a watermelon]

i don't know if i have a type

you've got one for girls.

that's different

how?

girls are girls
and boys are boys
there isn't an overlap between them, you know...
they're just different
sure, my type of girls is more defined, but it's not definite either

Re: a sequence of spams

gnasher - 2015-12-04 05:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: a sequence of spams

splasher - 2015-12-04 05:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: a sequence of spams

gnasher - 2015-12-04 05:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: a sequence of spams

splasher - 2015-12-04 05:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: a sequence of spams

gnasher - 2015-12-04 05:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: a sequence of spams

splasher - 2015-12-04 07:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: a sequence of spams

gnasher - 2015-12-04 07:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: a sequence of spams

splasher - 2015-12-04 07:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: a sequence of spams

gnasher - 2015-12-04 07:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: a sequence of spams

splasher - 2015-12-04 07:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: a sequence of spams

splasher - 2015-12-04 07:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: a sequence of spams

splasher - 2015-12-04 07:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: a sequence of spams

gnasher - 2015-12-04 07:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: a sequence of spams

gnasher - 2015-12-04 07:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: a sequence of spams

splasher - 2015-12-04 07:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: a sequence of spams

gnasher - 2015-12-05 07:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: a sequence of spams

splasher - 2015-12-06 01:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: a sequence of spams

gnasher - 2016-02-07 10:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: a sequence of spams

splasher - 2016-02-07 20:04 (UTC) - Expand

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only